|
ENTER TO THIS FORUM AND YOU CAN PARTICIPATE WITH YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE FOLLOWING PAPERS
|
|
If you want TO WRITE your comments or READ others,
please CLICK HERE.
|
|
If you want to read these articles click here.
|
 |
PSICHOANALYSIS AND EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PARADIGM OF COMPLEXITY |
|
-Dra. Nize Maria Campos Pellanda University of Santa Cruz do Sul, Brasil
-Dr. Luiz Ernesto Cabral Pellanda Porto Alegre, Brasil
|
|
This paper centers around the Cartesian paradigmatic
transition processes towards the autoorganized system
ideas. These reflections and the privileged status of
Psychoanalysis and Quantum Physics have produced a real
conmotion in the roots of Cartesian thinking. The system
and cibernetic theories imply the concept of
autoorganization, that promotes the emergence of a new
non-linear logic, in order to manage the complex
phenomena. Maturana and Varela elaborated the concept of
Autopoiesis, to express the autonomy-conectivity in
living creatures.
Starting from this point, we are placed in a reflection
about the way in which Psychoanalysis opposed that
epistemological perspective, through Klein's, Bion's and
Matte-Blanco's work. Many hypothesis have been
constructed fom the perspective of establishing
frontiers among disciplines and constituting, from the
nuclear human actions, the subject-knowledge.
Key words: complexity-paradigms-autoorganized systems-autopoiesis-
Quantum Physics-Cybernetics- Dissipatives
Structures-non-linear logic- Maturana- Varela-
Prigogine- disciplines
frontiers-subject/knowledge-Klein-Bion-Matte-Blanco-Von
Foerster
|
 |
IS IT NECESSARY TO "RECUPERATE" PSYCHOANALYSIS? |
|
Odilon de Mello Franco Filho - San Pablo,
Brasil
The paper points to evidences of a need to up-date
Psychoanalysis in its theory and method, trying to make
it more competitive with other scientific disciplines
which stand side by side whith it.
The author identifies in these trends the same movements
of recuperation wich was largely present in the
seventies and eighties and meant to adapt several human
disciplines to the frame-work of prevailing ideologies.
He states his opinion that Psychoanalysis doesn't have
to modernize its conceptual basis, nor adapt its method
to the demands of the market. Besides, it doesn't enter
in disfavouring epistemological and methodological
conditions in the interdisciplinary dialogue. What it
needs is to reinforce its identity based on the
confidence that its basic discoveries - such as those
concerning the unconscious - and its method, go on being
valid and fruitful.
Key words: epistemology-interdisciplinarity-crisis of
Psychoanalysis -neutrality -subjectivity- analytical
method
|
 |
THE
SCIENTIFIC PARADIGM AS A PROTECTIVE BASTION AGAINST
CONTEMPORARY UNCERTAINTY |
|
Dra. Susana Jallinsky - Bs. As, Argentina
The History of science is a history of
discontinuities and ruptures, promoted by debate and
disagreement. This is the reason why it is necessary
"to look at history" as something more than a
simple accumulation of chronologies and anecdotes. While
this occurrs, this post-modern world mistakes identity,
theory and politics. The conceptual exchange is in order
to insist on and defend complex thinking rigorousness.
So, it is necessary to sustain scientific discussions on
the concepts of "paradigms" (Kuhn) and not
only the "paradigm changes" but also "the
functional", "the effective" and the
paradoxical logics to maintain in order to maintain the
subversive foundational condition of Psychoanalysis.
Key words: history of
science-paradigms-debates-complex thinking-paradoxical
logical- foundational subversive condition of
Psychoanalysis
|
| |

|